Categories
Financial Planning

Flip The Value: Facing Decisions

Flip The Value: Facing Decisions

Lost golf balls

I have a confession to make. I don’t like looking for golf balls. If you golf, you already know what I’m talking about. If you don’t, let me paint a picture.

During a round of golf, inevitably a golfer in the group will hit a ball out of bounds. Yes, oftentimes this golfer is me. What happens next has always intrigued me. The golfer who hit the errant shot will traipse in the general area their ball landed in hopes of finding it. This triggers a polite social norm from the other golfers in the group. That is, all of the other golfers will join the hopeless search until the ball is found or minutes pass and the golfer concedes their fate. 

I should clarify, I’m talking about a situation where finding the ball is very unlikely and, if we DO find it, there is no hope for a shot. The golfer simply saved their ball and must drop in another area (with a penalty) and play on. We’re just looking for the ball. Four adults scavenging in the woods for 4-5 minutes for a ball that, on the high end, might cost $6.

I usually don’t share this pet peeve with fellow golfers. Ultimately I like to be a good team player and have fun with the group, so I’ll play along. After all, I realize I’m the weird one and it’s not worth me soap-boxing a point of view that I’ve developed over the years. I’ll just help look for the ball. 

Free sandwiches

A handful of years ago I learned that my favorite sandwich shop was giving free sandwiches to active duty military and veterans. Since I had errands to run, I decided to swing by and grab a free sub for lunch. However, as I pulled into the parking lot, I saw the line of likeminded freeloaders extending out the front door and down the block. I estimated the line would take at least 45 minutes. No thank you. I passed on the free sub and went about my day. But why?

The simple take to this story is I was too lazy or impatient to stand in line for 45 minutes for a free sub. Fair enough. However, there is a good lesson to be learned. This is the day I learned to flip the value.

As I drove away from the sandwich shop, I thought more about why I wasn’t as diligent as those standing in line. Why am I too lazy to wait? After some thought, it hit me. I heard a voice in my head ask me the question, “If a stranger asked me to wait in line for 45 minutes for $7, would I do it?” That began to clarify things. Then I got creative. What if I was forced to stand in that line, would I pay $7 to get out of it? Taking it even further, what if I already had the sandwich, but in order to keep it I had to wait in line for 45 minutes? I realized that there were three basic parts to the decision. The sandwich, my time, and $7. I could twist it however I wanted to.

This eureka moment was incredibly satisfying. It helped me realize why I make decisions like this. Since then, these types of questions have helped me make hundreds of spending decisions. Should I spend money, spend time, spend my personal labor, or abandon what I want entirely? The answer lies in these types of questions that twist the pros and cons; what I like to call flipping the value questions. As it turns out, there are three basic ways we can flip these questions.

Mowing the lawn: 3 versions of flipping the value

As seen above, there are many ways to flip the value, but eventually I found that there are three basic types. The easiest and most common way is to exchange the “what am I paying” part for the “what am I getting” in order to arrive at a sensible answer. Here’s an example.

Level 1: flip “what I’m paying” and “what I’m getting”

Do you pay someone to mow the lawn? Professional services can cost hundreds of dollars per visit. Is it worth it? Possibly. Flipping the value can help. Let’s ask the questions. 

  • What am I paying? Let’s say $150
  • What am I getting? A mowed lawn, time saved, wear and tear on my equipment saved, and not thinking about lawn care at all.

When deciding to pay or mow the lawn yourself, this is usually how most people decide. But geez, $150 is a lot of money! Are you sure? Let’s flip the value using the most basic level 1 version. That is, what am I getting vs what am I paying if I decide to mow it myself.

  • What am I paying? Time, labor, wear and tear on my equipment
  • What am I getting? Saving $150

OK, but we didn’t really learn anything here. It’s just the opposite of the questions above. However, it can better quantify your decision. Also, you may feel like saving $150 is as good as getting paid $150. If so, then you’re already on to level 2. 

Level 2: flip positions with the other side of the transaction.

Let’s get creative. Let’s switch positions with the lawn service. Thinking deeper, we can ask ourselves, “would I accept $150 to mow my yard?” Ah, there it is. That is flipping the value! Suddenly the decision becomes crystal clear. 

If you wouldn’t accept $150 to mow your yard, then your answer to hiring professionals is valid. Likewise, if you would gladly accept $150 to mow your yard, then it’s time to lace up and get to it yourself. 

Level 3: you already have what you want, would you pay to keep it?

This involves a little more imagination, but it can galvanize your position even further. In this scenario, you imagine you already have what you want. In this case, that means you already have a clean, manicured lawn. You haven’t paid or done anything to keep it. You just have it.

Now, what would you do or pay to keep it? Would you spend the time and labor equal to mowing your lawn to keep it? Would you pay $150 to keep it? 

These three examples work because they force you to think about each part of the equation differently. It’s like an algebra equation, moving parts back and forth from one side of the equation to the other. The beauty of these thought exercises is that you can confidently go forward with your decision. Each time you pay for lawn care, you know you flipped the value and made the right call for you.

Bigger decisions

Ultimately, flipping the value means exploring the value proposition of any decision from many different viewpoints. From the few examples above, we see how this can help us make small decisions, but how does it help with larger ideas?

  • Buying new vs used: You need to buy a car and have decided on the model you want. The new version costs $30,000, but there is a used option that is 3 years old with 40,000 miles on it that costs $20,000. What you’re paying vs. what you’re getting is obvious, but let’s flip the value. Using the third level of the idea, imagine you already own the new version of the car and someone offers to trade their 3 year old version with 40,000 miles, but they’ll give you $10,000 cash. If your answer to this proposition is yes, then the used car is for you. If not, then enjoy your new car. 
  • Investing for retirement: Imagine you’re already stretching your paycheck and saving as much as you can. However, while working with your financial planner, you learn that hitting your retirement goal will require you to save an additional $80/month. You still have some discretionary spending you enjoy each month. Restaurants, movies, etc., but you still hope to retire at a certain age. This one is less clear, but it’s still possible. Imagine you’re already on track for retirement. You already have enough saved but can’t eat out as often as you like. Again, using level 3, if someone offered you a less secure retirement for an additional 2-3 meals out per month, would you take it? 
  • Buying the dream home: I know you’ve scrolled through Zillow. I’ve done it too. Many of us dream of a home in the future. An upgraded family home, a vacation home, or a smaller luxury home after the nest is empty. Once we achieve the financial means to achieve this goal, it may be beneficial to flip the value. 

Level 3 might help us decide on the home we want. If we already had it, would we pay to keep it? Once we decide on a home to purchase, we might use level 2 to decide if the price is right for us. If we were the sellers, would we accept the price? Finally, we can revert to level 1 to best understand exactly what we’re paying for what we’re getting. 

As it turns out, sometimes there are many times in the decision process we can use these tools, but we can usually use all three each time.

Enjoy the choice

Flipping the value in any decision, regardless of the way you choose to do it, is intended to help you feel satisfied and confident in the decision itself. It can remove doubt and allow you to proceed with confidence. Likewise, it can help prevent buyer’s remorse after you take action on your decision.

Probably most valuable, it can provide peace of mind after the decision is made. I challenge my youngest with this often. When faced with the challenge of choosing between two desired options, he struggles to enjoy his choice and resist FOMO. His challenge is in letting go of the opportunity cost he spent; the alternative that he missed out on. Only when he freely gives up the cost of his decision can he fully enjoy the experience he decided on.

Once you flip the value and understand all angles of a decision, you will likely feel better about the price you have paid. Your money, your time, your labor, or your opportunity cost will suddenly feel well worth the benefit you receive. If not, you will risk wondering if you made the right call.

After all, should someone ask me to find a small white ball in the middle of the forest for $6, now I know my answer. 

An MFAA advisor can help you find the value of the decisions you are making.  In fact, finding an advisor is one of the decisions you can make!  Run your decision through the 3 levels and if you see the value, find an MFAA advisor here.

 

Categories
Military Pay

Your Pension and Your Portfolio

Your Pension and Your Portfolio

So you have a pension, now what?

Retirement income is difficult to imagine. For many folks out there, retirement savings, investing, and future income combines into a blur. Sure, you have a TSP or 401(k), but what about Social Security? Also, you might have deferred comp to consider or some sort of pension (and that’s if you’re lucky). It’s a difficult package to comprehend. In order to best understand how everything fits together, you can either think of each item individually or step back and stack them together as one cohesive unit. I’m sure you can guess what I prefer.

For now, let’s consider only your pension and TSP/401(k) retirement savings. Recently, I’ve talked to many folks about viewing these two separate pieces of retirement a little differently. Pensions and retirement savings are easy to view separately because they are very different (and most people do). However, there is another way. Instead of viewing these retirement tools separately, you can consider your pension as part of your investment portfolio. Rather, as an asset within it. 

Before I get ahead of myself, first let’s talk about a few ideas and concepts.

Asset Allocation

If the term “asset allocation” seems complicated or vague to you, don’t worry; you’re not alone. “Asset allocation” is a perfect example of taking a rather simple idea and saying it in a more confusing or intentionally sophisticated way. Admittedly, the financial advisory field is filled with such things. After all, what are you paying us for?

Simply put, asset allocation refers to the assets (stocks, bonds, etc.) you own in your portfolio. They are hopefully organized with some thought or purpose behind them; hence the term “allocation”. Together, “asset allocation” indicates a selection, curation, and organization of investment assets put together for a certain reason. Whether it be stocks, bonds, real estate, precious metals, crypto, and so on, the hope is these investments ultimately work together to help you achieve a specific goal. For this article, we’re talking about asset allocation in your retirement accounts (TSP, 401(k), IRA, etc.) and ultimately how your pension fits in.

The most common allocation

If you are familiar with the term asset allocation, you’re probably familiar with the most common form of it. The most common asset allocation is a mix of stocks and bonds. These assets tend to move in dissimilar ways, making them a commonly used way to diversify and create a solid allocation for a portfolio.

If someone says “I have a 60/40 portfolio” it usually means they have 60 percent in stocks and 40 percent in bonds. If they say 50/50, you guessed it, even split.

Breaking down the most common allocation

Before bringing your pension into the fold, one more detour. It’s important to understand how these parts of your allocation operate. Sticking with our common use example, we’ll look at stocks and bonds.

Stocks (Equities): These represent actual ownership in companies. The returns you receive are in the form of dividends and the growth of the stock price itself. Stocks can be more volatile, which means the price of the stocks can increase or decrease unpredictably. Further, dividends of stocks may be infrequent or unpredictable. 

Bonds (Income): These represent money lent to a company or government agency. The returns are in the form of interest payments made on the borrowed money as well as a potential increase of the bond price itself. 

More on bonds

Bonds are nicknamed “Income” because of the steady nature of how returns are realized. If you own individual bonds and hold them to maturity, you should experience a steady flow of interest payments from the borrower. Hence, “income”. Since you can count on these payments, they behave much differently than equities. While bonds usually have a lower rate of return, their predictability counteracts the volatility of the stocks and helps smooth out the overall returns.

Pension: The Greatest Income Allocation

Alright, back to our main idea: your pension.

Comparing your pension with the idea of stocks and bonds, do you notice any similarity? Stocks are unpredictable and may or may not pay dividends. Bonds are steadier and (should) pay a steady income of interest payments. Any thoughts?

If your pension is related to either of these ideas, it would certainly be bonds. Since bonds should pay a steady income of interest, your pension has some nice symmetry with them. When holding a bond, you expect regular payments. Similarly, with a pension, you expect regular payments. The regular nature of these payments counteracts the volatile nature of stocks (yes, for bonds and pension payments alike). It’s the behavior of these assets that we’re interested in. The nature of them matters very little. Income is income.

Part of the asset allocation

So, if we view your pension properly, it would be included in the “income” part of your portfolio. That’s easier said than done.

If you own stocks and bonds, their value is easy to compute. You can check stock prices and bond prices daily, making you well aware of how they’re doing. You can then take these prices and determine the balance of your assets.

For instance, if you started the year at a 60/40 allocation and your stocks outperformed your bonds, you might end the year at 65/35. If that happens, you could simply sell stocks and buy bonds until you get back to your 60/40 allocation. Congrats, you now understand rebalancing! 

Valuing your Pension

Pensions are more difficult to value in this way. This typically isn’t a problem because, for many individuals with pensions, they usually don’t include pensions as part of their retirement investment portfolio. Likely, these folks read somewhere that they should have a 70/30 portfolio or similar based on their age or some other variable. These people then allocated their retirement accounts to 70/30 and completely ignored their expected pension benefits. 

Viewed separately, their pension and retirement portfolio seem in great balance. However, viewed together, suddenly things are wildly askew.

Warning: math ahead

For those of you not interested in doing any math today, this is where I leave you. For you math nerds, get your calculators ready.

The present value of a pension

The good news: there is a way to include the value of your pension in your portfolio. 

The bad news: it’s math

First, we need to determine the present value of your pension benefit. The present value of your pension is the present value of all future payments if you were paid today. Sadly, this isn’t simply the value of all payments added together. You also need to consider the idea of investment return and growth of these payments (if applicable). Basically, we need to determine the value of a lump sum received today if you invested in the stock market and withdrew payments each month. In other words, what lump sum today has the same value of all future payments?

The formula (remember, I warned you)

PV = present value of the pension (what we’re solving for)

PMT = initial annual pension benefit (monthly payment x 12)

g = growth of pension payment (if the payment is adjusted for inflation, use 3% or whatever estimate you’re comfortable with. Lower is more conservative)

r = rate of return if you invested the lump sum in the stock market. Traditionally, 8% is a good estimate.

n = number of years you expect to receive the benefit; most common estimate is until age 90.

For example

Let’s say you just retired at age 60 and begin receiving a pension benefit. The benefit will pay you $800 per month ($9,600 a year) and will continue until your death. The payment will adjust annually and you estimate inflation to be around 3% a year. Finally, you expect to live another 30 years and the return you normally get from invested accounts is around 8% a year. 

If you wanted to know the present value (PV) of your pension, your calculation would look like this:

Once calculated, you would find the present value of your pension equals $145,686.75. That’s a nice chunk!

Now make it part of your portfolio

You now have the present value of your pension payment. Now what? 

To continue the example, let’s now imagine you have $400,000 in your IRA and have decided that a 50/50 portfolio will fit your risk tolerance. 50 percent stocks and 50 percent income. You therefore allocate $200,000 to stocks and $200,000 in bonds.

Oops, you forgot to include your pension! Adding your pension benefit to your portfolio, you now have $200,000 in stocks and $345,686.75 in bonds/income. That’s a 37/63 split, not a 50/50! Looks like we need to rebalance your portfolio but how do we do that? It’s pretty straightforward.

First, we add the present value of your pension to the total value of your IRA. We come to a total of $545,686.75. Since we want a 50/50 portfolio, we need to split this total evenly to discover our stock/bond mix. Divided in half, the totals for each should be $272,843.37. 

Since our pension value can only be considered part of our bond/income allocation, we begin with that. We subtract the pension value ($145,686.75) from the bond allocation target ($272,843.37) and arrive at our actual bond allocation number for the IRA: $127,156.62. 

After investing the $127,156.62 in bonds, we’re left with $272,843.38 to invest in stocks.

The totals:

Pension: $145,686.75

IRA Bond allocation: $127,156.62

IRA stock allocation: $272,843.38

To double check our math, we can add our pension and bond allocation together and compare it to our stock allocation. $145,686.75 + $127,156.62 = $272,843.37. 50/50 allocation achieved!

Why this matters

Why should we go through all this?

There is (or should be) a great deal of thought put into your investment allocation. You should consider your risk tolerance, risk capacity, age, time horizon, expected return, and so on. There are lots of things to consider when finding the right balance of assets.

Once you find the right allocation, it’s important to view it as it fits into your real, total retirement situation. Just as with our example, finding the right asset allocation only to ignore a pension benefit will leave your portfolio out of balance. Doing so will make your allocation much more conservative than you intend to be.

What’s wrong with being more conservative? There actually are a few problems with being too conservative. Underperforming overall returns can cause your portfolio to lag inflation and erode over time. This small pull can be unfelt in the short run but implode your plan over the long-term. 

More importantly, you’ve already decided on how conservative you want to be. That is, once you decide on an asset allocation, you have already determined the amount of risk you’re willing to take. And remember, risk is tied to return. The risk you have decided to take reflects the return you need to complete your plan. Ignoring your pension benefit means you actually have less risk (and less return) than you originally decided on. Regarding your pension as part of your portfolio can help. Just remember to keep everything in balance.

Don’t like doing math or need some help with some other aspect of your financial plan?  Talk with one of the MFAA Planners who can help you out.